AN ULTIMATE GAME CHANGER FOR THE 2020 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS
OCTOBER SURPRISE TRUMP2020 LANDSLIDE VICTORY !!!
By Nala Singham October 31, 2020
Double click to edit
AN ULTIMATE GAME CHANGER FOR THE 2020 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS
OCTOBER SURPRISE TRUMP2020 LANDSLIDE VICTORY !!!
By Nala Singham
From the deserts of Rajasthan India, a keen observer of American politics with the rising aspirations to have a female president, author Inder Dan Ratnu, penned a fictional anecdote titled “First Lady President”.
The book was published in 2003, and a revised edition in January of 2007, long before the 2008 presidential elections.
It is a fictional take on a US presidential election campaign featuring a female candidate. It is a story how such a figure might emerge as the first ever serious female candidate in a U.S. presidential election, and what opposition — both culturally and politically — she might encounter.
In April 2007, Inder Dan Ratnu mailed a copy of his book “First Lady President”, to Senator Barack Obama, though without proof of acknowledgment, Ratnu claims that Senator Obama might have used the contents of his book to defeat Senator Hillary Clinton for the presidential nomination. In the book , the Lady President’s winning theme was “change” and “anti-war stand”.
Two American journalists long after 2008 election following their convictions ,after viewing the overwhelming ‘EVIDENCE’ and have read the ‘EXPLANATIONS’ reported that ,in fact, Barack Obama had become president of USA in the first place by using Ratnu’s book First Lady President in 2008. Unbelievable. Isn’t it?
“ I offer my sincerest apology to President Trump and his family for whatever anti -Trump comments I made in my book ‘Alternative to Hillary—IMPEACHABLE President Trump’ written back in June - July 2016. It was based upon pure conjecture. After viewing his great qualities, virtues and performance for four long years, now as a measure of remorse and atonement, I am trying to correct my ‘blunder’ through making this website.” - Inder Dan Ratnu
1. Obama became president back in 2008 by taking two points('anti-war' and 'change' ) from a foreigner's(Indian named Inder Dan Ratnu's) book entitled First Lady President.
2. While using the first point- 'anti war' Obama blatantly misguided and cheated the American people by twisting the point and thus snatched the nomination and consequently the presidency from the hands of Hillary Clinton.
3.The same man - Ratnu has made now a very special full website (Trumpthelion) supporting President Trump’s re-election campaign, in which he appealed to the Indian Americans invoking the emotion of their patriotism, their duty towards their motherland India and by projecting President Trump as the first line of defense against Chinese threat due to his extraordinary qualities and visionary insights.
Joe Biden was picked up running mate by Barack Obama in 2008 , but how Obama had cheated the American people in 2007 primaries, consequently and subsequently became the president ? (Please pardon me for grammatical and punctuation errors if any).
After Iowa Hillary Clinton ran neck in neck with Barack Obama in 2007 primaries ,but could not break the lead of Obama gained by Iowa victory in primaries and finally she collapsed. It is a history now. All politicians of both parties ,all journalists and political analysts know it.What they do not know – I am disclosing to you now which can be brought to light by you precisely as Obama had brought to light the then 'past' issue of Iraq war resolution in 2008 which had been long dead.
Obama had said to the effect (not exact words) "I spoke against Iraq war ,Hillary voted in favor of the Iraq war resolution in US senate.Hence she is a pro--war person, but I am an anti-war man." This was the key argument which had turned the tables.It was the game changer which laid the foundation of his victory and thereby that of Obama's presidency.
On the face value it sounded a correct statement to a common person, but it was fundamentally flawed and absolutely misleading statement . But how ?
He was comparing 'speaking' anywhere with 'voting' in the senate just on the basis of 'favor' and 'against’ and arriving at a conclusion in his own favor.He twisted the fact by telling less than half truth and by concealing more than half of it. It was fundamentally wrong statement.He was not taking the common bench mark without which you cannot compare the things.It is like someone comparing high jump with a long jump just because both are measured in feet.But both are fundamentally different.
One claims "I jumped 20 ft in one leap, he jumped only 5ft and ten inches, hence I am the winner and better athlete-a champion." Without disclosing he jumped 'long' jump and the other a 'high' jump.Hence it is a trickful , misleading statement.To befool those who cannot see the truth. Another example, one heat athlete A claims , he is superior to B just because B had staggered and fallen on the track in the stadium in an earlier race, whereas he( A) had not. Without disclosing that he (A ) was not even a competitor in the heat and was not in the stadium either.He was a spectator outside the stadium .How could he fall? He was not there in the race.He was not even there in the stadium.It is a wrong, befooling comparison.
Obama was not a senator at the time of Iraq war.He 'spoke' against' the war like millions of others spoke in US. He was just one of them .He could not vote in the Senate as he was not a member of the senate in the first place. He was elected to it long after that. Hillary was a member of the Senate and she had to vote one way or the other.She voted in favor of the resolution ,but with solid strings attached to it.She was privy to intelligence reports, hence she took the decision to vote in favor.Obama was not a member ,hence no question of his seeing the reports, nor was he eligible to vote.He was comparing two absolutely unrelated /or incomparable things. And merely on the basis of pro and against he was asserting himself and won the first primary, then won the primaries as a whole and thus later got the nomination, and then eventually won the presidency.All through misleading, befooling the American people ,in other words through cheating. It was very hurting to half the democratic party.
I know this story because I had been personally associated with it and I have preserved the full evidence of it for the past 12 years.I had sent my book First Lady President to Obama 18 months before the election from which he took the “anti-war” point. I had attended the democratic party convention at Denver ,where I met Tim Kaine the then future vice presidential candidate(see my photo with him in the link : firstladypresident
Earlier, I had gone to Hillary’s office at NY with an intension, being the author of the book, to suggest how that point could be neutralized.I told the lady in-charge Madam Mary deBree that Obama could defeat Hillary Clinton due to the points (‘anti-war’ and ‘change’) of my book. She got incensed and stated, “we know American politics better than any ‘foreign’ writer.” And I did not dare do any thing further.
Please know more about me through the following link :
.jpg)